Understanding Cultural Relativism vs Ethnocentrism: A Guide for Beginners

Cultural relativism and ethnocentrism are two concepts that are frequently mentioned in academic and social circles. While related, the two approaches are diametrically opposed to each other. Understanding these two concepts is crucial for anyone interested in global affairs, anthropology, sociology, or any related field.

Introduction

Cultural relativism is the idea that a person’s beliefs, values, and practices should be understood within the context of their own culture. Ethnocentrism, on the other hand, is the tendency to judge other cultures based on one’s own cultural norms and values, often resulting in a bias against the unfamiliar.

As globalization has made the world more interconnected, cultural relativism and ethnocentrism have become increasingly relevant topics. In this guide, we will break down both concepts and provide relevant examples to help you understand the key differences between them.

Understanding Cultural Relativism

Cultural relativism is a perspective that emphasizes the importance of understanding other cultures on their terms. It recognizes that there are no universal standards, and that people from different cultures may approach problems, ideas, and practices differently. It does not mean that all beliefs or behaviors are acceptable; rather, it encourages us to withhold judgment until we have a full understanding of the cultural context.

For example, cultural relativism would suggest that the practice of arranged marriages in some cultures is acceptable because it is a cultural tradition that has been passed down for generations. While some people might find this practice oppressive or concerning, they would be guided by cultural relativism to avoid judging it before they have understood the role it plays for individuals.

Understanding Ethnocentrism

Ethnocentrism is the practice of judging other cultures according to the standards of one’s own culture. It is a tendency to see one’s own cultural practices or values as superior and to ignore cultural differences that do not align with one’s own perspective.

For example, ethnocentrism can be seen when Westerners believe that the way they dress or the food they eat is superior to that of other cultures. It can also manifest in more severe ways, such as when colonial powers impose their values and customs on other cultures, leading to cultural homogenization and in some instances, the belief that other cultures’ ways of life are inferior.

Cultural Relativism vs Ethnocentrism

While cultural relativism is concerned with inclusivity and understanding, ethnocentrism can lead to isolation and misinterpretation of other cultures. Ethnocentric perspectives can be dangerous because they are rooted in binary thinking—that is, good versus bad, right versus wrong—to the point that a person’s own culture may not be capable of reflecting on their relative nature.

Cultural relativism, with its flexible approach, allows a greater sense of cultural awareness, appreciation, and intercultural communication. It acknowledges that cultural practices and norms are dynamic and change over time. A relativistic perspective can lead to greater understanding and peace among cultures, as it allows individuals to respect and appreciate other practices and beliefs.

For instance, let’s imagine that a visitor from a Western culture is visiting Japan during the summer months. The visitor may find it strange to see people walking around with handkerchiefs over their entire heads to protect their faces from the sun. However, cultural relativism would encourage the visitor to withhold judgment and consider the practice in the context of traditional Japanese culture.

Conclusion

In conclusion, cultural relativism and ethnocentrism are two approaches that provide different views when it comes to understanding other cultures. Understanding these two concepts can help individuals to recognize their own biases, prejudices or mismatches when encountering people from different cultures.

Cultural relativism acknowledges that there are no universal standards of behaviour, and that different ethnic or cultural groups may have different approaches to a problem or issue. Ethnocentrism, on the other hand, can make individuals closed-off to other cultures. Therefore, the application of cultural relativism can bring diverse groups of people together and increase mutual respect and understanding for each other.

By understanding and appreciating other cultures, we will be more open to learning from them, and in turn, more able to work towards creating a world that can celebrate diversity and inclusivity, thus making the world a better place for all.

WE WANT YOU

(Note: Do you have knowledge or insights to share? Unlock new opportunities and expand your reach by joining our authors team. Click Registration to join us and share your expertise with our readers.)


Speech tips:

Please note that any statements involving politics will not be approved.


 

By knbbs-sharer

Hi, I'm Happy Sharer and I love sharing interesting and useful knowledge with others. I have a passion for learning and enjoy explaining complex concepts in a simple way.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *