The Ethics of Subjectivity in Journalism

Journalism is a profession that is often misunderstood due to the subjectivity involved in news reporting. In news reporting, there are a variety of perspectives, voices, and beliefs that come into play. The question arises; what is the ethical way to address subjectivity in journalism?

Subjectivity in journalism means a reporter’s personal beliefs and opinions that can affect the quality of news reporting. Initially, reporters would share their opinions with their readers without hesitation. However, this was called into question when the ideal of objectivity in journalism came to the forefront. Objectivity refers to the idea that journalists should not insert their own perspectives into reporting; instead, they should remain neutral at all times.

Despite being a relatively misunderstood concept, subjectivity is a critical part of journalism. As a journalist, you have your beliefs, thoughts, and world views. These attributes drive your passion for your work. When you acknowledge your perspective, you can tell stories that matter to your audiences, which evades the dull and monolithic stories that most mainstream outlets churn out.

Objectivity, as an ideal, is almost impossible to achieve in practical terms, but it offers an anchor for journalists to aspire to. Given this, journalists are instead expected to strive for impartiality. Journalists are expected to exhibit balanced reporting, which involves presenting both sides of an argument and not-influencing, censoring, or manipulating the presentation of facts, or selecting only favorable facts to create the illusion of balance.

The ethicality of subjectivity in journalism can be marred when journalists are expected to exercise self-censorship to avoid controversy or authoritarian repression. For example, governments imposing strict regulations on journalists often do so with manipulative intentions to censor opinions and control national narratives. In such cases, self-censorship can be crucial. However, it can also be ethically flawed if it leads to an absence of vital news reporting, and it can be misused to silence dissenting voices.

In conclusion, the ethics of subjectivity in journalism remain a contentious issue in the field. The subjectivity of journalists can add color, depth, and scrutiny to reporting, but it is vital they do not overstep their bounds or practice biases. Thus, the ethical code must be followed, and it is up to the journalist to find the right balance between their voice and the truthfulness of their report. The bottom line is that the ethicality of subjectivity and objectivity relies on a balancing act and requires the journalist to prioritize the objectivity of facts over their personal beliefs.