The Controversy of Cultural Practices Relativism: Assessing its Impact on Society

Cultural practices have always been a topic of debate across the world due to their subjective nature. While some societies deem certain practices as acceptable, others consider them unacceptable or immoral. This issue has given rise to the concept of cultural practices relativism, which argues that cultural practices should not be judged or evaluated from an outsider’s perspective.

However, cultural relativism has faced a lot of criticism, with some arguing that it promotes cultural imperialism, encourages intolerance and, in some cases, human rights violations. This article explores the controversy of cultural practices relativism and assesses its impact on society.

Cultural Practices Relativism Defined

Cultural practices relativism is the belief that cultural values and beliefs differ from society to society, and therefore, no culture can claim to be superior to the others. Therefore, it is unfair to judge any culture based on the standards or values of another culture. The concept emphasizes the importance of understanding the cultural context before evaluating any cultural practice. Those who support this idea believe that outsiders who criticize a culture lack an understanding of that culture’s historical, social, and economic underpinnings.

Advocates of cultural practices relativism argue that this concept helps to promote tolerance and respect for cultural diversity. They believe that non-interference with cultural practices enables societies to preserve their traditions and prevent cultural extinction. Furthermore, supporters of cultural relativism argue that cultural practices have different meanings to different societies, and it is discriminatory to impose one’s cultural values on others.

Cultural Practices Relativism Criticism

Cultural practices relativism has been criticized by some as an excuse for human rights violations and discrimination. According to them, some cultural practices violate fundamental human rights, such as female genital mutilation or forced marriages. The critics argue that cultural practices are not immune from criticism or evaluation, and the principles of human rights should guide societal practices. Besides, some argue that some values are universal, such as the right to life, and cultural relativism should not undermine them.

Another criticism of cultural practices relativism is that it promotes cultural imperialism and encourages intolerance. Critics argue that cultural relativism leads to cultural segregation, where minorities are expected to conform to the dominant culture’s values. This leads to the marginalization of minority groups and accentuates group differences.

Cultural Relativism and Society

The impact of cultural practices relativism on society is a complex issue. While it promotes cultural diversity and respect for different values, it can also lead to the justification of human rights violations. Moreover, cultural relativism can sometimes undermine universal human values and promote cultural imperialism.

It is essential to strike a balance between respect for cultural diversity and the need to uphold universal human values. In this regard, human rights should guide our evaluation of cultural practices. The principles of justice, human dignity, and equality should transcend cultural boundaries. Cultural practices that violate these principles should be condemned.

Conclusion

The issue of cultural practices relativism has been a subject of heated debate. While supporters of this concept emphasize the importance of respecting cultural differences, critics argue that it promotes cultural imperialism and encourages human rights violations. Therefore, it is essential to strike a balance between respecting cultural diversity and upholding universal human values. Cultural practices that violate human rights should be condemned, irrespective of cultural differences. Human rights should be the guiding principles for the evaluation of cultural practices.