Unearthing Intellectualism: A Rhetorical Analysis of “Hidden Intellectualism”

Unearthing Intellectualism: A Rhetorical Analysis of “Hidden Intellectualism”

In today’s world, there is a widespread notion that academic achievement is the only hallmark of intellectualism. However, Gerald Graff, in his article “Hidden Intellectualism,” challenges this popular idea by asserting that seemingly non-academic pursuits like sports, fashion, music and other pop culture can also be nurturing grounds for intellectual development. In his unique style, Graff illustrates that people may hold dormant intellectualism that could be unearthing through the subjects and issues that they genuinely care about.

Graff’s primary point revolves around the idea that academic programs and subjects often fail to engage students because they do not speak to the social context and interests of the learners. Thus, students become disinterested in the subjects, and their intellectual potential goes undeveloped. He cites his own journey of disliking books and academics while growing up and how he became an intellectual through non-academic channels such as sports and debates on current events. His educational struggle led him to unearth his intellectualism through topics he was passionate about, rather than by strictly abiding by academic curricula.

The author calls upon educators and curriculum developers to embrace a pedagogy that is flexible and adaptable to diverse student interests, take guidance from unconventional sources (as Graff did), and build bridges between academic and non-academic interests to create meaningful intellectual engagement. He maintains that engaging more students in significant intellectual conversations can lead to a more learned and thoughtful society, an idea echoed by later education scholars that focused on media education as well.

For example, in my personal experiences with my limited English speaking proficiency during my elementary school days, I discovered an interest in drawing and animation. Despite not being academic in nature, these interests allowed me to expand my English vocabulary and expressions. I learnt about topics which I could relate to, and this experience would foster my desire to learn more about the world around me. In contrast, I would struggle with subjects like history, science, and literature, since I could not comprehend key words they mentioned until I had pursued more studies in them. The way Graff unfolds his arguments also made me reflect on the practices of many language schools where one learns English predominantly by repeating test answers rather than by engaging in English language activities that are offered outside the classroom.

In conclusion, Graff’s “Hidden Intellectualism” unveils that people acquire intellectualism from various paths of life, not only just through academic subjects. His article has deep implications for how we interpret intellectualism and challenges educators to create classes and programs that integrate students’ non-academic interests into learning environments. Even though his theory does not solve every intellectual development issue, it presents a new angle to ponder over, particularly in fields of critical thinking and communication skills development. As the world becomes increasingly complex and competitive, learners need appropriate intellectual resiliency to strengthen their character and navigate new intellectual challenges. Edifying and thoughtful engagement with non-academic subjects could be a key in reaching this goal.

Speech tips:

Please note that any statements involving politics will not be approved.