Exploring the Implications of Wearable Technology: A Critical Look at the Google Glass

Exploring the Implications of Wearable Technology: A Critical Look at the Google Glass

In recent years, there has been a noticeable increase in the production and distribution of wearable technology. From health and fitness trackers, smart watches, and now even augmented reality smart glasses, such as Google Glass. While the sharing of information has become more accessible and interactive, there are implications that come along with this convenience. In this article, we will take a closer look at the implications of wearable technology, focusing on Google Glass and its impact on society.

Google Glass, introduced in 2013, aimed to revolutionize traditional eyewear by adding computing power to optical devices. The development promised to change the way in which we interact with technology whilst on the go, with hands-free access to information straight from the eyewear’s lens. However, the hype about its infinite potential was met with a wave of criticism and concern over privacy, safety, and surveillance.

One of the major implications of wearable technology like Google Glass is the privacy issues that it creates, specifically in public settings. With the built-in camera and audio recording device, a person equipped with the device can record their surroundings without appearing suspicious. This can lead to a breach of privacy, particularly if individuals are being recorded without their consent. Furthermore, the device’s ability to display information continuously means that people can also view personal data belonging to others, leading to a further breach of privacy.

Wearable technology can also have a detrimental impact on social interactions. Social cues and non-verbal communication can be misread or lost when individuals are continuously checking their notifications or information displayed on their wearable devices. This can lead to reduced communication and low-quality social interactions, ultimately leading to a society that is less able to interact with each other effectively. Wearable technology could potentially decrease a person’s ability to read social cues and respond appropriately in social situations.

Another pressing concern surrounding Google Glass is that the device can provide a similar distraction to that of a mobile phone whilst simultaneously being a physical obstruction to a person’s field of vision. This can pose a very serious safety risk when driving or operating machinery. The distraction caused by wearable technology has led to a number of legal issues. Google Glass faced legal challenges, as some states within the US considered it reckless driving to operate the device whilst driving.

In conclusion, whilst wearable technology has opened up new possibilities for communication and information sharing, the implications must also be considered. Google Glass, in particular, faces criticism and concern over its impact on privacy, social interaction, and safety. The device’s capabilities, though impressive, can create a range of issues that need to be weighed against the benefits before they are profusely adopted in society. It is clear that wearable technology, such as Google Glass, must be carefully regulated in order to harness its benefits whilst mitigating the risks associated with it.